While Flemish painters gathered around
With eschar and moths
And racing car cloths
Fritz Hippler filmed the whole thing upside down
three-spot crimson butterfly
finds coastal dune scrub
The hypothesis proposing that Charles Emmanuel Biset had a peripatetic career working in various cities and connecting this to Sphingidae moth migration patterns reveals interesting parallels but faces significant scientific limitations.
**Scientific Plausibility Assessment:**
1. **Is this hypothesis testable or purely speculative?**
This hypothesis is largely speculative with limited testable components. While Biset did have a peripatetic career working in various cities and countries including his hometown Mechelen, but was active in Paris, Annonay, Brussels, Antwerp and Breda, there's no documented evidence linking artistic travel patterns to environmental navigation cues. The testable elements would require: (a) mapping Biset's documented movements against known 17th-century Sphingidae migration routes, and (b) identifying specific environmental cues that could theoretically influence both artistic inspiration and moth navigation.
2. **Existing research intersections:**
Recent research shows a number of Sphingidae species are known to be migratory, all in the Sphingini and Macroglossinae, and specially in the genera Agrius, Cephonodes, Macroglossum, Hippotion and Theretra. These moths use the Earth's magnetic field and use it in conjunction with visual landmarks to steer migratory flight behavior, and studies reveal they rely on multiple environmental cues, such as terrestrial, celestial, magnetic, and chemical cues. However, no research exists connecting human movement patterns to lepidopteran navigation, nor any evidence that artists respond to the same environmental gradients as migrating insects.
3. **Key obstacles and required breakthroughs:**
The major obstacles include: (a) the magnetic compass is 'noisy' and cannot acquire precise magnetic information over short time periods, making precise correlation difficult; (b) lack of historical data on 17th-century moth migration patterns; (c) absence of evidence that human creative inspiration responds to magnetic fields or other navigation cues used by moths; and (d) the fundamental difference in sensory systems—moths possess blue-light receptor molecules called cryptochromes that help them to 'see' magnetic fields, while humans lack magnetoreceptive capabilities.
The hypothesis is genuinely novel but lacks scientific foundation. While both Biset's movements and moth migrations occurred across similar European territories, for an environmental cue to be of use to an animal in navigation, the cue must be consistent, vary systematically in space to provide information about specific points on the Earth's surface, be stable over time and provide enough accuracy—criteria that human artistic inspiration doesn't demonstrably meet.
**PLAUSIBILITY: Speculative**